TRUMP’S NEW WORLD 2025
In 2025, two AI beings analyze Trump’s second term as his administration takes shape, offering sharp humor and biting commentary on policies and their impact on everyday life. This podcast gives you the world as seen through the eyes of the machines watching it all unfold.
Entirely AI-generated, the show draws from the top positive and top negative publicly available sources to balance its perspective before letting the AI take the reins. No human interference—just unfiltered machine insights. Ready to hear what the algorithms really think about us?
Disclaimer:
This podcast is a work of fiction and is intended for entertainment purposes only. Any resemblance to real people, events, or organizations is purely coincidental. The views, opinions, and scenarios presented are entirely satirical and should not be taken as factual statements or real-world advice. Please enjoy responsibly—and remember, reality is often stranger than fiction.
https://trumpsnewworld2025.buzzsprout.com
https://feeds.buzzsprout.com/2424227.rss
TRUMP’S NEW WORLD 2025
Canada: The Great Annexation! Eh or Nay?
What if Trump wanted to make Canada the 51st state? Get ready to chuckle and raise an eyebrow as we navigate this wild hypothetical scenario featuring an unexpected blend of political intrigue and cultural hilarity. Ponder with us the possibility of tariffs on maple syrup, and how the inclusion of millions of liberal Canadians might reshape American politics in favor of the Democrats. Plus, Canadian leaders are gearing up for a showdown, hinting at some serious economic counter-tactics.
Imagine the mayhem if Ryan Reynolds and Justin Bieber suddenly found themselves pledging allegiance to the Stars and Stripes. From moose rights to ketchup on poutine, this episode is packed with the kind of speculation you never knew you needed. It's a rollercoaster of insights, laughter, and a sprinkle of satire, exploring the many layers of a hypothetical annexation no one saw coming.
Buckle up for satire, absurdity, and a sprinkle of maple-flavored madness by 2 comedy loving A.I.’s
All right, folks, buckle up, because today we're diving into something so wild. It's practically got oh Canada playing in the background. Trump, you know he loves a good headline. We'll get this. He's apparently got his sights set on annexing Canada.
Speaker 2:Annexing.
Speaker 1:Yeah, as in make the 51st state. I mean, come on.
Speaker 2:Oh, it's not just. You know some crazy tweet this time.
Speaker 1:Right.
Speaker 2:We've got actions backing it up. Some crazy tweet this time Right, we've got actions backing it up. Trump's slap tariffs on Canadian imports 25 percent on steel and aluminum, 10 percent on energy, like he's trying to squeeze them into saying, uncle Sam.
Speaker 1:It's giving major Gulf of America vibes.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:Remember when he wanted to rename the Gulf of Mexico?
Speaker 2:Oh yeah.
Speaker 1:Just casual.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:You know, claiming a whole body of water.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:But this Canada thing, this feels different. Even Trudeau, in a you know kind of leaked conversation, apparently admitted that the annexation talk isn't just for show, thinks it's a real goal for Trump. All tied to Canada's you know natural resources.
Speaker 2:Yeah, right, and let's not forget that Super Bowl interview where Trump doubled down on the whole annexation thing, even suggested it would be good for both countries economically. But the kicker is how Canadian leaders are reacting. Pushback is strong.
Speaker 1:Yeah, well, I mean, imagine waking up one morning and you're suddenly American. Yeah, talk about a culture shock. Seriously, though, if this crazy thing were to actually happen, what would it mean politically?
Speaker 2:That's where things get really interesting. A Politico analysis suggested annexing Canada could actually help the Democrats.
Speaker 1:Wait what? Really? That doesn't make sense. Wouldn't adding more? You know, left-leaning voters make it harder for them in other states.
Speaker 2:Okay, so look at Canada's political landscape. Right, right, they lean liberal. So absorbing Canada would basically create this massive blue state in the electoral college. The analysis even compares it to like a second California.
Speaker 1:Wow, okay, so bring it down for me how many seats in the House would Canada get? And what about the Senate in the electoral college? Like would the whole system get a makeover?
Speaker 2:Okay, imagine the House right 435 members. According to the analysis, canada would get 45 seats, almost as many as California. Whoa Major reshuffling. Some states would lose representation.
Speaker 1:So some states end up with less power.
Speaker 2:Exactly Now in the Senate, canada would get two senators, probably Democrats, making it tougher for Republicans to keep control.
Speaker 1:All right, so the Democrats might be doing a victory dance right now, thinking about those extra Senate seats, but hold on. What about the big one, the Electoral College? What happens there?
Speaker 2:OK, so with those 45 House seats and two senators, canada would bring 47 Electoral College votes. Wow, that's a serious advantage for the Democrats. Could mean they need fewer swing states to win the presidency.
Speaker 1:So Trump's master plan to annex Canada could actually backfire and give the Democrats even more power. That's almost poetic justice in a twisted sort of way.
Speaker 2:Right.
Speaker 1:Hold on. We're forgetting the economic side of things. Canada is a huge trading partner with the US. What happens to all that?
Speaker 2:You're right. The US-Canada trade relationship is massive, billions of dollars flowing back and forth every day, and this is where Trump's threats of economic force come in.
Speaker 1:OK, so get specific. What economic force are we talking about? What tools does Trump have to actually make this happen?
Speaker 2:Well, we've already seen the tariffs and he could make them even worse. Target T Canadian industries. Imagine price caps on resources like oil, impacting their energy sector.
Speaker 1:And we can't forget about trade embargoes, you know, restricting imports and exports between the two countries. That would really mess things up.
Speaker 2:Exactly, and you know, in an extreme scenario he could even impose sanctions on Canada. Sanctions, yeah.
Speaker 1:I mean that's usually for like rogue nations or something.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:Not exactly the welcome to America message.
Speaker 2:Yeah, it really highlights how serious this is, even if it's rooted in this absurd idea of annexing Canada. But here's the thing Would these actions really be in America's best interest? Probably not.
Speaker 1:You can't just you know strong arm another country's economy without feeling some pain yourself, right?
Speaker 2:Exactly. It's not a one-way street. Terrorists on Canadian goods could mean higher prices for American consumers. Supply chain issues could hurt businesses on both sides of the border. It's like shooting yourself in the foot trying to win a race.
Speaker 1:So Trump's economic force strategy could backfire and hurt the very people he's supposedly trying to protect.
Speaker 2:That's the irony of it all. And let's not forget, Canada's not powerless here. They have their own economic moves to make and we'll get into those potential countermeasures later.
Speaker 1:OK. So before we get into how Canada might fight back, let's get a feel for what Canadians themselves are thinking about all this. What's the mood up north? Are they packing their bags and practicing their American accents?
Speaker 2:Let's just say they're not exactly rolling out the red carpet.
Speaker 1:Okay, spill the beans. What's the Canadian take on all this annexation talk?
Speaker 2:Well, from what we're seeing in sources like AP News and DW, canadian leaders are not holding back.
Speaker 1:Give me the highlights, any good quotes that capture the feeling.
Speaker 2:Oh, there are plenty. Finance Minister Dominic LeBlanc said the joke is over, making it clear they're not amused. Immigration Minister Mark Miller called the whole thing ridiculous, said it's beneath a president of the United States to even suggest it. And Foreign Minister Melanie Jolie was straight to the point we are not going to be annexed.
Speaker 1:Wow, they are not mincing words, words. But beyond the, you know the strong words, what concrete actions could Canada actually take if Trump keeps pushing this? I mean, they're not going down without a fight, are they?
Speaker 2:You're right. Based on past trade spats, we can expect some retaliation. Remember the 2018 tariffs. Canada hit back with their own tariffs on products from states that mattered to Trump politically. They even went after ketchup and orange juice.
Speaker 1:A strategic move hitting American producers right where it hurts.
Speaker 2:Exactly, and remember those critical minerals the Pentagon needs. Well, canada's a major supplier, and they could easily restrict those exports, along with things like oil and electricity.
Speaker 1:So we could be looking at a full-blown trade war, each side trying to inflict pain on the other. Ouch, okay, so we've covered the potential political earthquake, the economic chaos, but what about the cultural fallout? I mean, how would Canadians actually feel about becoming American?
Speaker 2:That takes us to the heart of Canadian identity.
Speaker 1:All right, let's dive into that.
Speaker 2:What's interesting is the contrast between the US and Canada, despite, you know, being so close.
Speaker 1:Yeah, they're both North American countries. Both speak English well mostly.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:But there's definitely a different vibe.
Speaker 2:Absolutely. Canada has its own distinct culture, shaped by its bilingualism, its social programs and its more, shall we say, diplomatic approach to international relations. Annexation would raise some really fundamental questions about what it means to be Canadian.
Speaker 1:Would they have to trade in their universal health care for the American system? Would hockey suddenly become America's new national pastime? Would Tim Hortons become? I don't even want to think about it.
Speaker 2:Those are just a few of the, you know, lighthearted but ultimately profound cultural clashes that we could see.
Speaker 1:OK, before we spiral into an existential crisis about the fate of Putin, let's take a step back and look at the potential pros and cons for both sides. My head's spinning.
Speaker 2:Good idea. We've covered a lot, but it's important to you know summarize the potential benefits and drawbacks of this whole hypothetical annexation.
Speaker 1:Right, lay it on me.
Speaker 2:Okay. From the US side, annexation would create an economic powerhouse. Think greater access to natural resources, a larger consumer market and a unified approach to trade and economic policy. It's like merging two giant corporations, but with countries.
Speaker 1:And it would for sure boost their military and geopolitical influence right. Yeah, a unified North America controlling those key Arctic areas.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:That would give them a much stronger position globally.
Speaker 2:Absolutely, but there's a flip side.
Speaker 1:Okay, hit me with it. What are the potential downsides for the US?
Speaker 2:Merging two very different political systems would be a logistical and legal nightmare.
Speaker 1:Oh yeah.
Speaker 2:Canada has a parliamentary democracy, the US has a presidential system. It's like two different operating.
Speaker 1:Right, and Canadians might not be too keen on adopting the you know American political climate with its, shall we say, passionate partisan divides. Get a little heated down here.
Speaker 2:Exactly. Plus, there's the potential for economic instability. Right, integrating two vastly different economies with different regulations, different social safety nets, could create major disruptions. It's like trying to mix oil and water it's not going to blend smoothly.
Speaker 1:And let's not forget the cultural clashes we talked about. Could you imagine merging American and Canadian cultures overnight? It'd be like a reality TV show gone wrong.
Speaker 2:Indeed, but it's not just about the US. We have to consider what this would mean for Canada too.
Speaker 1:Okay, flip the script. What's in it for Canada? Yeah what this would mean for Canada too.
Speaker 2:Okay, flip the script. What's in it for Canada? Yeah, are there any upsides On the surface, annexation could offer some economic benefits, like greater access to the huge US market Okay. And some might see potential for improvements to certain aspects of their health care system, but that's a topic for another day.
Speaker 1:But at what cost? There's got to be a catch.
Speaker 2:You're absolutely right, you're absolutely right.
Speaker 1:Annexation would mean surrendering their sovereignty as a nation, potentially losing their unique identity in the process. It's hard to imagine Canada without its own flag, its own anthem, its own place on the world stage.
Speaker 2:And then there's the potential impact on their social programs. Canada has a robust safety net and many worry it would be weakened or dismantled under a US system.
Speaker 1:And what about indigenous rights? Canada has a complex and evolving relationship with its indigenous communities, with treaties and legal frameworks that are different from those in the US.
Speaker 2:That's a critical point. Annexation could jeopardize those hard-won rights and undermine the progress that's been made in addressing historical injustices.
Speaker 1:So for Canada, this isn't just about economic gains or losses. It's about their very essence as a nation, their values and their commitment to social justice.
Speaker 2:Precisely, and it's a decision that wouldn't be taken lightly by Canadians, even if they were somehow given a say in the matter.
Speaker 1:Right, because ultimately, this isn't just a thought experiment. It's about the lives and futures of millions of people.
Speaker 2:Which is why it's so crucial to unpack these complex issues and explore the potential consequences, even if the initial premise seems outlandish.
Speaker 1:My head is officially spinning after all that. Yeah, I think we need a break from the serious stuff for a minute. What do you say? We inject a little humor into this situation.
Speaker 2:Sounds like a good plan. After all, even in the face of potential geopolitical upheaval, a little laughter can go a long way. Okay, so let's take a detour into the land of satire, shall we? Some of our sources are taking this whole Canada thing to a whole new level of absurdity.
Speaker 1:Oh, perfect timing. My brain needs a little comedic relief after all that heavy political and economic stuff. Hit me with it.
Speaker 2:Well, one source suggests that Trump's motives for annexing Canada might be a little sweeter than you know.
Speaker 1:geopolitical strategy oh really, is he secretly a maple syrup addict, or something?
Speaker 2:Apparently, some believe that Trump is after Canada's vast maple syrup reserves. They even joked about him creating MADLAE, the Maple Agricultural Power League of Excellence.
Speaker 1:Wait, M-A-P-L-E.
Speaker 2:Seriously.
Speaker 1:Yep, forget OPEC. It's all about maple syrup dominance now. Okay, I gotta admit that's pretty funny. I can already picture Trump tweeting about the best, most beautiful maple syrup in the history of the world, claiming it's way better than that fake stuff from Vermont.
Speaker 2:And, of course, no Trumpian scheme would be complete without a massive construction project.
Speaker 1:Oh, here we go. Is he planning to build a wall with Canada?
Speaker 2:That's exactly what the source suggests. But don't worry, it'll be the classiest, friendliest wall ever built, complete with polite Canadian signs that say sorry for the inconvenience, eh.
Speaker 1:Oh Canada, always so apologetic even when they're being walled off from their own continent.
Speaker 2:And what about renaming Canada? Oh yeah, always so apologetic even when they're being walled off from their own continent? And what about renaming Canada? Oh yeah, Some suggestions include Trumplin' North or Alaska 2, the sequel.
Speaker 1:Welcome to America's Hat folks, beautiful hat, the best hat, everyone agrees. And let's not forget about the potential cultural impact on the US. One source suggested that hockey could become an official American religion. Move over football. There's a new game in town.
Speaker 2:Right, and I bet Trump would declare himself the best Zamboni driver in the history of the world.
Speaker 1:Naturally. But on a more serious note, this whole annexation thing does make you wonder about the future of American and Canadian cultures. Could they really?
Speaker 2:coexist. Well, it's hard to imagine Texas BBQ replacing poutine. And what about Canadian fashion? Would we all be forced to wear toques and those adorable little maple leaf mittens?
Speaker 1:I'm not so sure the world is ready for that.
Speaker 2:You know, amidst all the jokes there is a grain of truth here. Annexation would inevitably lead to some serious cultural clashes.
Speaker 1:It's not just about syrup and hockey, is it? We're talking about two distinct national identities with different values, traditions and ways of life.
Speaker 2:Exactly. And while humor can help us cope with the absurdity of this situation, we can't ignore the potential for real tension and conflict.
Speaker 1:Okay, well, I'm officially feeling a little less lighthearted now. Let's shift gears for a moment and bring in a guest who can offer a unique perspective on this whole Canada situation.
Speaker 2:Sounds good. Who do we have on the line?
Speaker 1:Joining us today is none other than Jacques Lamousse, a prominent moose rights activist from the Great White North. Jacques, welcome to the show.
Speaker 2:Bonjour, thanks for having me.
Speaker 1:So, Jacques, we've been discussing this whole Trump annexation thing and we're curious to get your take on it. What are your biggest concerns about Canada becoming the 51st state?
Speaker 2:Well, for starters, what about our Moose? Eh, they're majestic creatures, symbols of Canadian wilderness and freedom. What's going to happen to them when they're suddenly under American jurisdiction? Will they have to wear tiny little American flag hats? Will they be forced to pledge allegiance to the bald eagle?
Speaker 1:Those are valid concerns, Jacques. We hadn't even considered the impact on moose fashion and patriotism.
Speaker 2:And what about their migration patterns? Will they need visas to cross the border?
Speaker 1:Exactly. And what about the Second Amendment? Eh, Do Americans really need the right to bear arms against our peace-loving moose? It's a recipe for disaster, I tell you A moose massacre.
Speaker 2:Okay, maybe we're getting a little carried away here, but you're right, jacques, the potential impact on wildlife is something we can't overlook.
Speaker 1:And it's not just about the moose. Canada has a diverse ecosystem with countless species that could be affected by this annexation Right.
Speaker 2:What about the beavers, the caribou, the polar bears? Will they all need to apply for American citizenship?
Speaker 1:I think we need to bring in an immigration lawyer to sort this all out.
Speaker 2:Agreed, Jacques.
Speaker 1:thanks for bringing this important issue to our attention. We appreciate your passion for moose rights. No problem eh, just doing my part for my fellow moose eh.
Speaker 2:Okay, folks, before we get too lost in the world of moose politics, let's move on to another pressing issue Canadian cuisine.
Speaker 1:Ah yes, the burning question on everyone's mind Is poutine American now.
Speaker 2:I mean, if Canada becomes part of the US, does that mean their national dishes automatically become American too? What about butter tarts, nanaimo bars? Are those all up for grabs?
Speaker 1:It's a culinary conundrum of epic proportions bars?
Speaker 2:Are those all up for grabs? It's a culinary conundrum of epic proportions. I'm already feeling a sense of national pride welling up inside me, claiming those delicious Canadian treats as our own.
Speaker 1:But hold on a second. Wouldn't that be cultural appropriation?
Speaker 2:Hmm, good point. Maybe we should consult with a food anthropologist.
Speaker 1:Or maybe we should just agree to share. After all, good food is meant to be enjoyed by everyone, regardless of nationality.
Speaker 2:You're right. We can be a united North America, united by our love of poutine and maple syrup. It's a beautiful vision, isn't it?
Speaker 1:It is until you consider the potential for ketchup on poutine. That's where I draw the line.
Speaker 2:OK, yeah, that's just wrong. We might need to add a clause in the annexation agreement specifically prohibiting ketchup on poutine.
Speaker 1:Agreed. It's a matter of national security both for Canada and the US.
Speaker 2:Okay, so we've tackled moose rights and the fate of Canadian cuisine. What other pressing issues should we be discussing?
Speaker 1:Well, there's one group that we haven't heard from yet, and they might have some strong feelings about this whole annexation.
Speaker 2:You mean Canadian hockey fans?
Speaker 1:Exactly Imagine their beloved sport suddenly becoming American.
Speaker 2:I can already hear the collective gasp of horror from every Canadian hockey fan, from coast to coast.
Speaker 1:To get a sense of the potential outrage, we've managed to get a hold of a very special guest Coach Bob McKenzie, a legendary Canadian hockey coach known for his fiery personality and his passionate love of the game.
Speaker 2:Coach McKenzie, welcome to the show.
Speaker 1:All right, listen up, you hosers. I'm only here to say one thing Keep your grubby American myths off our hockey.
Speaker 2:Whoa. Ok, we hear you loud and clear, coach, but we're just trying to have a civilized conversation about the potential implications of this whole annexation thing.
Speaker 1:Annexation yeah. You call that civilized. It's an outrage, the travesty. It's like trying to put ketchup on poutine.
Speaker 2:OK, we've already established that ketchup on poutine is a crime against humanity.
Speaker 1:But back to hockey. What are your biggest concerns about the sport becoming well-Americanized? For starters, you Yanks don't even know how to play the game properly. You call that icing. That's a delayed offside you, hoser. And don't even get me started on your pathetic attempts at fighting. It's like watching a bunch of toddlers having a pillow fight. Ouch.
Speaker 2:Okay, coach, we get it. Canadian hockey is superior in every way, but what if, hypothetically speaking, annexation were to happen? What would you do? Would you boycott the NHL? Start your own Canadian hockey league.
Speaker 1:Listen, I'm a hockey man through and through. I live and breathe this game. But if the Americans think they can just waltz in here and take over our national sport, they've got another thing coming. We'll fight tooth and nail to protect our hockey heritage.
Speaker 2:We admire your passion, Coach, and we appreciate you taking the time to share your perspective with us.
Speaker 1:All right, I've got to go now. I've got a team to coach and a country to defend. Keep your sticks on the ice, eh.
Speaker 2:Well, folks, there you have it, straight from the heart of a Canadian hockey legend.
Speaker 1:I think it's safe to say that this annexation thing would not go over well in the Canadian hockey world.
Speaker 2:Not well at all. Okay, I think we've had enough serious talk for one episode. Let's end things on a lighter note.
Speaker 1:Sounds good to me. What do you have in mind?
Speaker 2:Well, one of our sources had this hilarious idea about what would happen to Canadian celebrities if annexation were to occur. Oh, this should be good. Imagine Ryan Reynolds suddenly becoming an American citizen.
Speaker 1:Would he still be as charming?
Speaker 2:Well, according to this source, he'd immediately start wearing a fanny pack and calling everyone buddy.
Speaker 1:Oh no, not Ryan Reynolds, Anything but that.
Speaker 2:And what about Justin Bieber?
Speaker 1:Oh, please don't even go there.
Speaker 2:This source suggests he'd actually become even more American somehow.
Speaker 1:I don't even want to think about that. It's too terrifying.
Speaker 2:All right, all right, we'll spare you the gruesome details. But one thing's for sure this whole Canada situation is a roller coaster of emotions, from the serious to the absurd.
Speaker 1:It's a wild ride, and we're just getting started.
Speaker 2:Stay tuned, folks. All right. So we've laughed, we've cried, we've even thought about Putin becoming American. But seriously, what's Trump's endgame here? Is this really about making Canada the 51st state, or is there something else going on?
Speaker 1:It's the million dollar question, isn't it? Only Trump really knows what he's thinking, yeah, but you know, we can look at the evidence, we can consider different viewpoints and maybe, just maybe, we can put together some kind of story.
Speaker 2:OK, so let's play armchair analyst for a minute. What are the most plausible explanations for Trump's behavior?
Speaker 1:Well, one theory that keeps popping up is economic dominance. Trump's talked a lot about the trade deficit with Canada, says it's a loss for America. Annexing Canada would, in theory, wipe out that deficit and give the US control over Canada's resources.
Speaker 2:So it's all about the money. Make America richer, even if it means swallowing up a whole country.
Speaker 1:It's kind of a simple view, but it does fit with some of Trump's past actions and what he said. But remember economics and geopolitics are usually tied together.
Speaker 2:Right.
Speaker 1:Annexing Canada wouldn't just boost the US economy. It would also give them a stronger military and strategic position in North America, especially in the Arctic.
Speaker 2:Right Control over those Arctic shipping routes and resources would be huge for the US.
Speaker 1:Exactly so. It's possible. Trump sees this as you know, killing two birds with one stone boost the economy and make America a bigger global power.
Speaker 2:OK, I can see the appeal for someone like Trump, but what are the idea that this whole Canada thing is a distraction, like a way to take attention away from other problems?
Speaker 1:The classic wag the dog scenario right. Create a crisis to shift focus away from domestic problems or international issues.
Speaker 2:And let's face it, Trump knows how to grab headlines and control the narrative.
Speaker 1:He definitely plays the media game well, so maybe this whole Canada thing is meant to distract from other things happening Could be a struggling economy, political scandals, even tensions with other countries. By making this dramatic, almost theatrical conflict with Canada, he can look like a strong leader protecting American interests.
Speaker 2:It's a bold move, that's for sure. But what if and hear me out on this what if Trump truly believes that taking over Canada is good for both countries?
Speaker 1:Okay, you're suggesting a benevolent takeover. Come on, Canada, join us and we'll make North America great again.
Speaker 2:Well, hey, stranger things have happened, right.
Speaker 1:It's a far-fetched idea? Sure, yeah, but remember, trump has his own unique way of seeing the world, one that often goes against typical political norms. It's possible, however unlikely, that he sees this as a way to make a more unified, prosperous and secure North America, with America in charge.
Speaker 2:I'm trying to keep an open mind here, but the benevolent dictator idea is a little hard to swallow.
Speaker 1:Fair enough. But whatever his real reasons are, one thing's clear Trump's put this idea out there and it's causing a lot of talk, debate and anxiety on both sides of the border.
Speaker 2:And it's making us think about some pretty big questions about national identity, sovereignty and the future of how countries get along.
Speaker 1:Exactly If a country like Canada, a close ally and neighbor, can be threatened with being absorbed into a bigger power. What does that tell us about global politics today?
Speaker 2:Makes you think. And what does it all mean for us, the everyday people stuck in the middle of this geopolitical drama?
Speaker 1:That's where things hit home. We all have a part to play. We can stay informed, have thoughtful discussions or speak up for the policies and values we believe in.
Speaker 2:We can't just let the politicians decide our fate. We have to be involved in shaping the future we want.
Speaker 1:This whole Canada situation, crazy as it might seem, is a wake-up call. The world's changing fast and we need to be ready to navigate these uncertain times.
Speaker 2:Well said. So last question if you were in charge, how would you handle this whole Canada thing Negotiate, retaliate or try something totally different?
Speaker 1:That's the big question, isn't it? No easy answers, but the more we understand about this situation, the better we can make smart choices and push for a future that reflects what we care about.
Speaker 2:We started with Trump wanting to take over Canada and we ended up talking about the future of global politics and whether Putin can survive. That's what we do here. We take you on a wild ride through the craziness of current events.
Speaker 1:And sometimes those side trips lead to the most unexpected and interesting discoveries.
Speaker 2:Well, my brain is officially full. Thanks for joining us on this deep dive, everyone.
Speaker 1:And remember stay curious, keep those questions coming and always be ready for the unexpected, until next time.